The Difference between Skill & Education: Knowing Does
Not Make You Skilled
Knowledge/Education- is information acquired through sensory input:
·
Reading, watching, listening, touching, etc. The
concept of knowledge refers to familiarity with factual information and
theoretical concepts. Knowledge can be transferred from one person to another
or it can be self acquired through observation and study.
·
Skills, however, refer to the ability to apply
knowledge to specific situations. Skills are developed through practice,
through a combination of sensory input and output. As an example, social skills
are developed through interaction with people by observing, listening, and
speaking with them. Trial and error is probably the best way to achieve skills
mastery.
To make it simple, knowledge is theoretical and skills are
practical. You can know all the rules of a sport, know all the teams and all
players, know all the statistics, but this only makes you knowledgeable about
this sport; it does not make you any good at it. To become good at a sport you
must play it, practice its techniques, and improve your skills through
experience. You don’t need to know all the teams or all the players to practice
a sport and you can easily learn the rules as you play, through trial and
error.
The same applies to a job: One can know a lot about a
subject matter, but might not have the skills required to apply that knowledge
to specific tasks, since knowledge does not provide skills. However, developing
skills normally provides some knowledge, as practicing those skills results in
sensory inputs. As an example, an aerospace engineer may know a lot about
avionics and flight theory, but this alone does not make him an aircraft pilot.
On the other end, an aircraft pilot only requires a minimal level of knowledge
about avionics and flight theory in order to be able to fly the plane, and this
knowledge will continue to increase as he gains experience flying a simulator or
an actual plane.
Developing Skills
Therefore, if you want to better prepare individuals to meet
a desired performance, they don’t need more lectures. What they need is more practice. The production of more presentations and more page turners will only
make people more knowledgeable; it will not provide them with skills to better
do their job. Seems logical, no? Why then are so many learning professionals
still addressing performance gaps with lectures, online presentations, or other
theoretical content?
In order for people to achieve a desired performance at a
task they must be provided with opportunities to perform the actions required
so they can improve their performance at this task until they master it. While
a lot of what is actually called training is basically nothing more than
information dump, no surprise that such training programs fail to deliver
results. Training should be about activities, scenarios, and simulation. When
training is about lectures, presentations, and quizzes we end up with
individuals who know a lot of things but can’t do much with it.
Of course skills can be developed more easily if one has
prior knowledge of the task to be accomplished: Learning to fly a plane through
trial and errors without having a slight idea about how planes fly may be quite
risky, but theory should be limited to the minimum required to be able to
perform the task. You cannot learn how to drive a car without knowing where the
accelerator and brake pedals are. However, the best way to learn the effects of
acceleration and brakes is not to read about it, but to actually experience it.
Practice is the only way to develop skills: The more you do
something, the better you get at doing it.
No comments:
Post a Comment